Choose Comparison Type:
| Species | Potency | Onset | Duration | Typical Dose | Growing Difficulty | Notes |
|---|
| Dose Level | Dried Weight | Experience Type | Effects | Duration | Support Needed |
|---|
| Method | Onset Time | Duration | Intensity | Nausea Risk | Preparation | Best For |
|---|
| Protocol | Schedule | Dose Range | Additional Supplements | Duration | Best For |
|---|
About Comparison Charts
Comparison charts help users quickly understand differences between species potency, dosage levels, consumption methods, and microdosing protocols. They should be interactive for web use and printable for offline reference.
Features
- Species: potency tier, onset, duration, typical dose ranges, risks, notes.
- Dosage: micro/low/moderate/strong ranges, expected effects, support needed.
- Methods: tea, capsules, lemon tek, chocolate, tincture; onset, duration, nausea profile.
- Protocols: Fadiman, Stamets, custom; schedule, dose, break days, precautions.
Design Patterns
Use responsive tables with stacked layout on mobile. Provide column toggles, sorting, and quick filters. Add badges for risk level and potency. Offer “key takeaways” summaries above charts.
Interactivity
- Sortable columns and search.
- Filter by category (potency, duration, risk).
- Export to CSV/PDF; print-friendly stylesheet.
- Highlight rows on hover/focus; keyboard navigation enabled.
Accessibility
Use semantic tables with headers and scope attributes. Ensure focus order, visible focus styles, and caption/summary text. Provide text alternatives for icons and color legends.
Data Quality
Sources should be evidence-based with citations where possible. Include ranges and note variability. Use conservative estimates for safety.
Performance and Print
Load data from lightweight JSON. Defer heavy visuals. Provide print CSS to convert dark theme to light on paper, include borders, and avoid clipped columns.